Whack-A-Mole

All we experience cannot be other than subjective. What we see, hear, feel etc is a reality filtered through a screen of fallible sense perception and preconception.

The written word, which has a potential for objective precision in the realm of science, in the philosophical domain becomes much more vulnerable to selective, subjective interpretation.

In particular, those conditioned in one of the Abrahamic religions are habituated to see and hear only that which they are predisposed to see and hear, and they ‘disregard the rest’

Therefore, I’m quite certain at least some who read the following will do so very selectively indeed.

I’m not at all interested in debating with those who, while clinging to dogma, suggest I have a closed mind, and those who, possessing little understanding of logic and reason, presumptuously deem mine flawed.

Attempting rational discourse with such individuals on an Internet forum is like playing Whack-A-Mole without the visceral satisfaction of bopping those little heads. [Read more →]

The Art of Argument…

The Argument Clinic

A reception desk in a sort of office building.

Receptionist: Yes, sir?
Man: I’d like to have an argument please.
Receptionist: Certainly, sir, have you been here before…?
Man: No, this is my first time.
Receptionist: I see. Do you want to have the full argument, or were you thinking of taking a course? [Read more →]

A New Proof?!

# 556
ARGUMENT FROM LACK OF BODY
(1) Jesus’ body went missing
(2) No one ever found it!
(3) Therefore, God exists.

a slight test

See the gallery! Click the dog!

higgins in the field

More to come…

Bubbles in the stream…

We exist not as separate entities.

Although we appear to do so, we are not persons moving through time/space. Rather we are expressions of the multiplicity of process that is the universe, and define ourselves as distinct solely due to the abstracting neural functioning which characterizes our particular mode of energy/matter.

This is the basis for unbelief in a universe composed of ‘things’.

Despite the apparent perception of a multiplicity of objects, I must inevitably recognize all objects depend ultimately on ultimate subject. Therefore ‘I’ cannot be object. Since subject cannot exist in the absence of object, nor object in the absence of subject, it follows neither exists apart from the convenient illusion invented by the neural process of perception/thought.

I do not, therefore, believe in my ’self’ as a being, and I certainly don’t believe in a God-being.


Reason has little to do with it

Reason is Cast Aside
Lady Science Has Fled
Faith and Superstition
Fill The Believer’s Head
Teaching Pigs to Sing (Skeptical Inquirer July/August 2006)

It was the beginning of an odyssey that introduced me to a strange race of people who believed in angels but not in germs. I can only compare it to visiting a carnival freak show of intellectual, rather than physical, anomalies. I observed how the average nonskeptic member of the public reacts to these anomalies. It almost destroyed my faith in human reason.

The End of Faith…

I almost missed this…

YouTube - Sam Harris at Idea CIty ‘05

psychotic reaction

Truthdig - Israel’s Barrier to Peace

We react to the manifestation of rage rather than the cause of rage. We are as morally compromised as those we condemn, as incomprehensible to them as they are to us.

PR

I really do hate TV

Video Bomb - Peace, Propaganda & The Promised Land

For G**’s Sake!

Weren’t you already?

CBC News: ‘We will attack everywhere,’ al-Qaeda leader warns

“It is a jihad for God’s sake and will last until [our] religion prevails. We will attack everywhere.”